Layout Image
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • GVO Conference
  • TopSites
  • Contact

Archive for February 2010

Responding to Offers of Books to Review

By Des Walsh
Sunday, February 28th, 2010

Why I don’t instantly say yes please when offered books to review

books

I love books.

I love talking about books I enjoy.

I don’t really love reviewing books, although I’m pretty sure that in doing so I learn more about the subject than on a more casual, less accountable reading.

But lately I seem to be getting quite a few requests to accept advance copies of books, both on subjects to do with the main focus of this blog, working from home, and also on social media, about which I blog more frequently on my Des Walsh dot Com site.

And I’m not keeping up. The books are starting to become something of a burden, not a pleasure.

Part of the challenge I have with the whole exercise of reviewing is that I have this sense – old-fashioned, quaint even, as it may be – that I should actually have read a book before posting about it. And related to that is the fact that I want to feel that I’ve done justice to the book.

At the same time, I realize that the authors and their publicists might prefer I did not take that line and if I was not going to read the whole book, couldn’t I at least skim it and write a brief post about it, with a link?

Not an unreasonable expectation.  Just not an easy one for me to deal with.

There is also the fact that some PR/marketing companies offering books for review don’t realize I’m in Australia and then have trouble getting the publisher to ship the book here.

Time for some clarification

So for a recent pitch I received from someone I did not know, I wrote what I thought was an honest and hopefully helpful response, and in which I included a “let you off the hook” clause for the possibility that they hadn’t realized they would need  to ship the book to Australia :

The concept certainly looks interesting and I am sure there is a demand. I’m frankly being rather cautious about accepting books for review as it’s not my primary focus, they tend to pile up and I feel guilty and even more so when the people who have sent them follow up, quite understandably, with prompts.

Also, if I accept a book for review I will only do so on the basis that I can review it honestly, not just write a puff piece. I would add that I do not seek to gain any notoriety by being unfair or unkind and I do try to “accentuate the positive”.

Then there is the expense for you as I am in Australia and do not any more agree to review books from electronic versions. Some publishers refuse to ship review copies to Australia.

Sorry to be less than enthusiastic, but I wanted to be open with you. If you still want to chance my getting around to reviewing the book, please let me know and I’ll send you a shipping address. If you decide otherwise I will understand completely.

Guess what? Date sent Feb 1, as of Feb 28 no reply.

Not holding my breath. :)

Anyone care to share their thoughts on this, perhaps showing me a better way to handle it?

Image credit: “Books behind the bed”, zimpenfish, via Flickr, Creative Commons

Categories : Books
Tags : book reviews, Books

What is the Best Duration for a Podcast?

By Des Walsh
Saturday, February 27th, 2010

Invitation to participate in a short survey to help with podcast planning

BlogTalkRadioLogoI’ve put together a short survey (see below), designed to elicit some views and advice on what would be the best time duration for my podcast show on BlogTalkRadio, Des Walsh & Friends.

I’ve been sticking to a thirty minute duration, but am not wedded to that. The thirty minute duration was chosen on the basis of a highly subjective assessment, namely that:

  • it enabled my guests and me to share with listeners some reasonably useful/interesting information and opinions
  • because it was only half an hour it was not going to be seen as a less than productive time sink.

Related to the second bullet point, the thirty minute duration also met a criterion I’d read or heard from some podcast expert, that it was a good “commute” timeframe for those who want to download and listen on the go.

But I don’t really know.

I do know that when the half hour comes up I am typically wanting to keep going with the conversation.

Then, when I listen to one hour podcasts, some seem a bit too unfocused, a bit rambly and I get a bit antsy.

Hence the survey. It’s really short, with only a few questions and a box for any comments.

Sorry, there is no Caribbean cruise for the most interesting response, but I will report back here on the results. And I’ll be truly grateful.

Think of the good karma. :)

Click here to take survey

Categories : Podcasting
Tags : BlogTalkRadio, podcast duration
Next Page »

Get Updates

Subscribe in a Reader Get Updates By Email Twitter Facebook

We recommend

WEB Tv Workshops BYO Audio HostGator Web Hosting Free Productivity Training Visibility Secrets iThemes Builder for WordPress AWeber Email Management

Search this site

Lijit Search

Featured Sites

Home Office Furniture

Audio Visual Equipment Rental

Credit Card

CenturyLink-Home Phone, DSL Internet

Market Samurai:SEO Software

Video Academy- Get Your Videos Seen-

Archives

Categories

Check out the Genesis Framework
Thesis Theme for WordPress:  Options Galore and a Helpful Support Community

Boomer Authority

Boomer Authority

Administrative Pages

Sitemap
Advertise
Privacy
Comments Policy

Valid RSS button
Thinking Home Business | Practical Tips For People Who Work From Home
Copyright © 2012 All Rights Reserved
iThemes Builder by iThemes
Powered by WordPress