<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlogRush: Traffic Klondyke or Fool&#8217;s Gold?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/09/17/blogrush-traffic-klondyke-or-fools-gold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/09/17/blogrush-traffic-klondyke-or-fools-gold/</link>
	<description>Sharing ideas, business experience and tips for professionals working from home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:20:10 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Domeck</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/09/17/blogrush-traffic-klondyke-or-fools-gold/comment-page-1/#comment-2498</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Domeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/09/17/blogrush-traffic-klondyke-or-fools-gold/#comment-2498</guid>
		<description>I have heard very little of this service since its original &quot;blast&quot;. In reading blogs I am also finding fewer and fewer blogs using the service. What happened?

I know in the past similair &quot;attempts&quot; have fizzled out after a short time also. It seems a certain &quot;few&quot; are pouncing on this stuff and overuse it to the point everyone gets turned off. I was really hoping that since it was aproduct from John Reece that it would be different this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard very little of this service since its original &#8220;blast&#8221;. In reading blogs I am also finding fewer and fewer blogs using the service. What happened?</p>
<p>I know in the past similair &#8220;attempts&#8221; have fizzled out after a short time also. It seems a certain &#8220;few&#8221; are pouncing on this stuff and overuse it to the point everyone gets turned off. I was really hoping that since it was aproduct from John Reece that it would be different this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogRush May Prove to Be Useful, Still Being Fixed</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/09/17/blogrush-traffic-klondyke-or-fools-gold/comment-page-1/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogRush May Prove to Be Useful, Still Being Fixed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/09/17/blogrush-traffic-klondyke-or-fools-gold/#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>[...] for a system offering the prospect of generating amazing traffic to your blog while you sleep. In BlogRush: Traffic Klondike or Fool&#8217;s Gold? I rounded up a range of comments on the new system and indicated my mixture of mildly hopeful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for a system offering the prospect of generating amazing traffic to your blog while you sleep. In BlogRush: Traffic Klondike or Fool&#8217;s Gold? I rounded up a range of comments on the new system and indicated my mixture of mildly hopeful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chester's Clean House</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/09/17/blogrush-traffic-klondyke-or-fools-gold/comment-page-1/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>Chester's Clean House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/09/17/blogrush-traffic-klondyke-or-fools-gold/#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t gotten very much traffic at all.  All most everyone I have seen running it has it under the fold so I don&#039;t think the widget is actually getting many eyeballs.  My guess is that the average click thru rate will be .025%.  I guess that is okay if you have a huge network that gets millions of page views a day.  It is still really early and only time will tell.  Please keep us informed of your experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t gotten very much traffic at all.  All most everyone I have seen running it has it under the fold so I don&#8217;t think the widget is actually getting many eyeballs.  My guess is that the average click thru rate will be .025%.  I guess that is okay if you have a huge network that gets millions of page views a day.  It is still really early and only time will tell.  Please keep us informed of your experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/09/17/blogrush-traffic-klondyke-or-fools-gold/comment-page-1/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/09/17/blogrush-traffic-klondyke-or-fools-gold/#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>My experience with it has been less than spectacular. I just posted on this topic today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience with it has been less than spectacular. I just posted on this topic today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Des Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/09/17/blogrush-traffic-klondyke-or-fools-gold/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Des Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/09/17/blogrush-traffic-klondyke-or-fools-gold/#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>Scott
And I will keep watching what you and others have to say. My apologies for mis-spelling your name in the original post - very slack of me: now corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott<br />
And I will keep watching what you and others have to say. My apologies for mis-spelling your name in the original post &#8211; very slack of me: now corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
