There must still be some courses or e-books where people new to blogging are told to email other bloggers and suggest or request an exchange of links. I don’t know what other explanation there would be for the emails I get on a fairly regular basis, out of the blue, from people I don’t know, wanting me to exchange links.
They’re right about one thing: links can add value to a blog’s ranking. Equally, some links can detract from a blog’s ranking.
My standard reply to those emails is that
I certainly don’t mind if someone links to a post of mine and emails me to draw that to my attention (although if they used trackbacks I would know anyway). That or a trackback will almost certainly lead me to visiting their site and if I like it enough I might well choose to link to it.
And of course there are colleagues and friends to whose blogs I link because I value them and what they are doing.
But reciprocal links? No.
Rajesh Setty’s post How do you execute a link exchange? is a good reference post for anyone who is told they should request such exchanges. The post title is of course rhetorical.
The only people who will comply with this request will be people who also need links. The people who deserve to be linked are already getting linked without any of these programs.
His advice towards a strategy to build great links?
One thing I would add is perhaps to have a page somewhere on your site which explains your policy and strategy. That way you don’t have to compose a detailed response to each person who emails you: you can just refer them politely to your policy page and perhaps wish them well. Why burn bridges by ignoring them? Who knows, one day they might be so famous you would love them to link to you 
No, I don’t have a policy page on that - yet. And the blogroll/links component of this blog has not carried over automatically to this WordPress-platformed reincarnation. A couple more items for the list!
If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.
Just came across this via http://www.irishblogs.ie/ . And it seems pretty fair. But sometimes when you are trying to get a new site off the ground all you can do is beg and see how far you can get.
I guess by putting a link to my blog with my name, I am already in fact creating some type of link back.
btw. Rajesh Setty’s link seems broken.
regards,
paul.
I’m fairly generous when it comes to handing out links. I’m really not sure why, I just always have been that way. Now with the scroll bar I am no longer worried about the length of my link list, so I’m happy to give out the link love.. If someone contacted me and asked me to link to them, as long as they aren’t a blatant advertising only type of blog, and I read their blog and like what I see - and that happens much of the time, then the answer would be yes. So I guess, people who are emailing Des, email me instead.
Snoskred - has a new home at -
http://www.snoskred.org/
please update your links.
Paul
I understand your point of view and yes you are creating a link back via the comment, which is one reason I moderate comments. Some “comments” are just spam to create links. Thanks for the note on the link - went to fix it and in the process I seem to have deleted the post: working now on reinstating the content of the post!
Snoskred
When I list someone’s blog on mine, as for example I have listed yours today in the new Links page I am building, I’m saying, in effect, this is a site worth visiting. I think you are really making a point about different degrees of latitude. I don’t want to be tied to some kind of agreement about reciprocity, especially if the site in question is one more likely to reduce the ranking of my site than to enhance it.
[…] http://www.thinkinghomebusiness.com/2007/07/17/why-i-dont-do-link-exchanges […]
Well, your are not missing anything Des. Reciprocal links have basically lost all weight, as Google and other head liners weight them next to nothing. Building one way links is the way to go now. Writing articles and buying links from popular directories are the way to go. Check out http://www.allbuziness.com an authoritative business directory I manage.
You may be a little hard on those new bloggers who are genuinely in a learning process and are told that they need links to promote their blog. Instead take it as a compliment that people want to be linked to you!
As an aside, some of our more widely linked bloggers seem to have an indordinate number of dead links; so if they deleted them perhaps they might be able to provide links - and encouragement - to the less well endowed (link wise). Or is that too radical a point of view?
Frank
I don’t see that it is doing a service to new bloggers to encourage them in the practice of seeking *reciprocal* links. Why not encourage them to spend the time building relationships and forming or joining communities at MyBlogLog or BlogCatalog, or on Facebook or wherever. That will probably bring about a degree of reciprocity but it will be organic. Interesting suggestion about dead links and how they could be replaced.
[…] » Why I Do Not Do Link Exchanges Thinking Home Business: Navigating the world of blogs and social m… … to have a page somewhere on your site which explains your policy and strategy. That way you don’t have to compose a detailed response to each person who emails you: you can just refer them politely to your policy page and perhaps wish them well. Why burn bridges by ignoring them? Who knows, one day they might be so famous you would love them to link to you
[…]
I agree with you. If you write well then reader will automatically flock around you..
I’m no SEO expert but I can see why a one way link is deemed more valuable than one that is exchanged.
It means that the person placing it is doing so because they want to, not just so that they will receive one back. Hence it’s a much more authoritative “vote of confidence” in the site linked to.